The Homestead Exemption debate in 2 minutes

A City of Austin 20% homestead exemption is a tax shift policy that is likely to get a lot of attention from the incoming City Council. Here’s what you need to know.

1. What is it exactly?

The 20% homestead exemption (HEx) reduces the assessed value of one’s primary residence by 20%. This is the maximum allowed by the state. The taxable value reduction decreases the taxes owed on a primary residence. A home assessed at $200,000 would only have a taxable value of $160,000.  Additionally, HEx shifts overall taxation towards commercial and rental properties. The City’s Finance staff estimated HEx revenue loss at $36 million – equivalent to the entire Austin Public Library budget – given current assessment and tax rate levels. The loss can be made up through spending cuts or an increase in City taxes and fees.

2. Will it increase Austin’s ‘affordability’?

No. For the overwhelming majority of beneficiaries, the reduced property taxes will not represent a meaningful share of their income. For example, the median Austin homestead value is roughly $200,000. And the median income is $52,453 (2012 American Community Survey).  According to the City’s finance department, the median household would see a $16 per month reduction under a HEx financed with spending cuts and a $10 reduction if property taxes were raised to make up the lost revenue. Either way, the tax reduction represents less than half of one percent (< 0.5%) of the median Austin household’s annual income.

3. Will it stop Austin’s assessment surge?

No. While HEx decreases assessed value, it doesn’t impact the drivers of Austin’s assessment surge: growth in the total number of Austinites with high incomes coupled with a lack of supply in popular neighborhoods. According to the City’s recent housing market study (PDF), there is significant pressure being placed in the middle of the market based on the competition for a limited supply of homes near employment centers.


4. Why do HEx opponents call it ‘regressive’?

‘Progressive’ taxes take a greater share of income from those with higher incomes. A flat 20% homestead exemption means that a person with a $1,000,000 (one million) assessment gets 10 times as much of a monetary benefit as a person with a $100,000 house, regardless of their income.

One can see this play out in the district-by-district distribution of HEx dollars (via Austin Chronicle):


And here’s a drill-down into which districts receive a majority of the reduction dollars:


5. Are there alternatives?

Many. If the goal is to create a shift in revenue policy that helps affordability, then it would be more effective to focus resources on those with the lowest incomes or Austinites going through extreme financial hardships such as unemployment. Austin Energy’s customer assistance program is an example of this approach. If the goal is to stop assessment surges, then addressing supply concerns through both land use liberalization and subsidized housing construction are actually effective policies. As it stands, HEx is just expensive symbolism.

Want to make a comment? Tweet at the author or comment on Facebook.  


Posted in Fiscal

Good Move

Austin’s local government officials should play board games. Many of our most pressing local public policy problems would benefit from overhauls in strategy, as well as creativity in how we manage risk. Playing board games can help by strengthening the following five problem-solving habits:


Continue reading

Posted in Wonker's Delight

Prop 1 in 1 minute

This FAQ provides a pro-transit, anti-Proposition 1 perspective. Here’s the extended version of this FAQ.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized

Pro-Transit, Anti-Proposition 1

Why would a pragmatic progressive that wants to move Austin away from car-dependence oppose an investment in light rail? In brief, because the details of this proposal mean more sprawl and lower transit system ridership. Here is the pro-transit, anti-Proposition 1 perspective to Frequently Asked Questions about this November’s bond.

Continue reading

Posted in Transportation

Rail Risks

Proposition 1 rail has much higher operating costs than bus-based alternatives, yet it will achieve essentially the same ridership as bus service. This is due to the selection of a route with ridership potential too low to take advantage of rail’s economies of scale. As a result, serving East Riverside-Highland (ER-HL) with Proposition 1 rail lowers overall system-wide ridership.


Continue reading

Posted in Transportation

Let’s Go do rail like Houston!

Advocates for this November’s ‘road and rail’ Proposition 1 would like the electorate to believe the proposed light rail segment will achieve success similar to Houston’s stellar Red Line. Here are the top 3 reasons why they are wrong and why it matters.


Source: National Transit Database. “UPT” means unlinked passenger trip (i.e. boarding). Median values for a category in bold.

Continue reading

Posted in Transportation

10 bucks or 10,000 homes

A homestead exemption based on a fixed percent of home value is a regressive and ineffective affordability policy. It engenders a permanent loss of much-needed revenue for public investments. Spending directly on policies that promote abundant housing supply is an effective, progressive alternative. Said progressive alternative targets the actual problem: extraordinary assessment growth due to a lack of supply in desirable neighborhoods.

Continue reading

Posted in Fiscal