City Budget Realities

A new City budget is being debated. Here are five key points that help clarify the meaningful choices policymakers face.

Continue reading

Posted in Fiscal

Better Billion

November’s urban rail and road package aims to “do something” as Austin clamors for transportation solutions. Sadly, as blog readers know, the proposal will not be effective at reducing congestion or promoting car-independence. It will, however, exhaust our reserves of political will and actual capital available for bold solutions. An alternative package is needed, one that will actually work. Below, I describe one possible set of ‘better billion’ investments.

better_billion

Continue reading

Posted in Development, Transportation, Water

A day late and a few thousand riders short

Earlier today, Project Connect released a methodology memo (PDF version) providing an overview of their approach to estimating ridership.  The memo raises three major concerns, which I describe below.

Continue reading

Posted in Transit, Transportation | 7 Comments

CodeNEXT Pitch

Yesterday, I joined an enthusiastic group of Auranauts and other solution-minded Austinites at a CodeNEXT community input session.  There were many great pro-reform speakers. Here’s the presentation I delivered.  Let’s turn to the main points of the presentation and some additional ideas generated from discussion with defenders of the status quo.

Continue reading

Posted in Development | 1 Comment

Trophy, Hammer, Lottery, Transit

The proposed urban rail route’s operational costs are too high. This will undermine the overall transit system by slowing down frequency increases for productive bus routes; it could potentially also lead to outright future cuts to system coverage. The likelihood that there could be an improvement in the outlook for urban rail operating costs is small.

Continue reading

Posted in Transit, Transportation | 22 Comments

Time for plan B(RT)

The initial ridership and cost estimates are in for the proposed Grove-Highland Rail (GHR) route. And they are thoroughly disappointing. Simply put, GHR will consume an enormous amount of our transit borrowing capacity without providing mobility at a meaningfully lower rider subsidy than regular bus service.

Continue reading

Posted in Transportation | 5 Comments

Peak Misinformation

Project Connect’s staff and consultants recommended against using Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in large part because of its inability to meet peak time needs as the Austin of 2030 and beyond keeps growing. However, upon closer inspection, BRT seems to have plenty of capacity to meet system needs.

Continue reading

Posted in Transportation | 2 Comments